Euthanasia disagree essay

euthanasia debate pdf

In50 per cent of patients requesting suicide were assisted to die by a doctor who had been their physician for eight weeks or less. Various forms of the slippery slope argument If we change the law and accept voluntary euthanasia, we will not be able to keep it under control.

Euthanasia essay pdf

Life is good in and of itself, not just as a means to achieve an end. These fears have been discredited with the empirical evidence that we have provided from countries and states in which PAS is already supported. This scenario may seem extreme, but we should remember that ideas that were initially thought impossible and unthinkable can quickly become acceptable. Matthew Hampson was a promising young rugby player until a collapsing scrum left him paralysed from the neck down and requiring a ventilator to breathe. Some people consider euthanasia to be a mercy killing and others consider it to be murder. However, it may be speculated or conceived that it is not murder because the premeditated advancement of death by a person of another has been consented to in principle thereby the choice being made is a deliberate one for which one's right in its very own nature permits the condition to be moral. Accepting euthanasia means accepting that some lives such as elderly or people with disabilities are worth less than others. It cannot be viewed as a quick and easy fix, or a way to protect patients from inadequate care arrangements. Those who oppose this argument say that properly drafted legislation can draw a firm barrier across the slippery slope. Human life must be respected regardless of age, gender, race, religion, social status or potential for success. The Price They Pay The opposition stands with critics of PAS who have found that once assisted suicide is accepted as an available option for competent terminally ill adults, it may be permitted for ever-larger groups of persons, including the non-terminally ill, those whose quality of life is perceived to be diminished by a physical disability, persons whose pain is emotional instead of physical, and so forth.

The debate specifically says "Do you agree or disagree with euthanasia or mercy killing? Some societies have regarded people with disabilities as inferior, or as a burden on society. The Worst Evil A patient may accurately judge their current quality of life to be unacceptable, but adequate care would always increase their quality of life to the point where they would reconsider.

euthanasia research paper

Maybe they want to be seen as someone who was strong and kept up with a battle to fight disease. They are likely to want it to be kept separate and special, and may be unlikely to be willing to have it included in normal reimbursement mechanisms.

mercy killing essay

The doctor does not know all the treatment options that could be offered to the patient.

Rated 6/10 based on 82 review
Euthanasia: agreeing to disagree?