Philosophers of all the times promoted different ways to gain the keys for both of these doors, but still there is no single solution to fit for all. It became a hobby of mine since I was very little, not just as a single purpose just for eat.
The position of ethical relativism is that moral judgments can never be universal; they depend on so many things, including cultural stereotypes, social patterns, traditions and customs, group and individual practices, that it is unreasonable to judge all the people with the same standards.
The good life should be more virtue based rather than being all about material objects and what you have for yourself. Rather, the good life for a person is the active life of functioning well in those ways that are essential and unique to humans People called me that, but I know that I'm not a princess at Is there a right answer at all.
On the one hand, this position makes us obliged to tolerate the behavior we do not like, even if we do not understand and do not share that model. Virtue ethics describe the character of a moral agent as a driving force for ethical behavior, rather than deontology, consequentialism, or pragmatic ethics.
We all should continue to use reason, value friendship, keep life simple, master ourselves, be honest, be kind, and avoid greed as well as needless excess.
These experiences shape our worldview and from this, we formulate our inherent values. Through his journey, a depiction of the forces of good and evil is revealed.